Thursday, 10 April 2014

MADRAS HIGH COURT LAUDS HONESTY OF S.R. JANGID, IPS AND AWARDS COMPENSATION

In a rare judicial verdict, a hallmark of pride for any public servant, the Madras High Court has lauded Mr. S.R.Jangid,IPS., for his integrity.
Mr.Jangid filed a suit for claiming damages from a yellow magazine called Netrikann  that had published defamatory articles against Mr Jangid. Apart from publishing the articles, the authorTr. Nagaimugan, had sent petitions and letters to various authorities under the garb of  “Thani Tamizhar Sena”, which led to unnecessary enquiries  by the Authorities.A lawful action taken against the land grabbers was portrayed as a Real Estate work to pressurise the officer to take action against the party favoured by him. As it was a case of cheating and land grabbing, the action of Mr.Jangid was upheld by the court. Similarly,  the findings  of the enquiries  conducted  by various  Agencies  also  revealed  that such allegations werefalse and defamatory. Following which, Mr.Jangid filed a suit in the Madras High Court for claiming damages for Rs. 10 lakh. The Madras High Court after weighing up  the evidence  adduced,  held  that the claim made by Mr Jangid was justifiable as the intention of the publications were aimed only at defaming him on specious  grounds.  The observations made in the Judgment  delivered  in C.No.1089/2007  dated 8.2.2010 are reproduced below-

“This court had already found that there was no good intention nor good faith in publishing the said letter of one Nagaimugan but it was published only with the intention to blackmail the plaintiff to withdraw the case pending against him in Pallikaranai Police station. Therefore, the defendant who has published false information against the plaintiff should have been injuncted from doing so in future. The plaintiff (S R Jangid IPS) being an honest and efficient police officer who is concerning the welfare of the society with impartial visionshould not be disturbed by similar defamatory articles published by the defendant and if the defendant is not injuncted by passing an order, it would certainly give mental torture or mental agony to the plaintiff which may deviate the plaintiff from doing service to the society, eventhough such defamatory and libellous publication are false in nature and they may also cause damage to the good image of the plaintiff. Therefore, the balance of convenience is also found in favour of the plaintiff. Accordingly, this court is inclined to grant permanent injunction against the defendant as prayed for in the suit.For the foregoing discussions, I am of the considered view that the plaintiff (S R Jangid IPS) is entitled for the damages of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs) as claimed by him against the defendant. Similarly he is also entitled for permanent injunction against the defendant as prayed for.
In fine, the suit is decreed as prayed for with costs.”

            This is one of a few judgments whereby the Honorable High Court, apart from awarding damages to a public servant gave a clean chit to Mr.S.R.Jangid IPS. This is nothing but a seal of approval for his credibility and integrity. 

1 comment: